Assalam Alaikum viewers you are reading the pakistan times mews. Imran Khan is a development I told you last week that some meetings have been held with Shahbaz Sharif and some plans are being made that Supreme Court off Not following Pakistan's decision and in the coming days there will be an attempt to create more division within the supreme court and Nawaz Sharif has an old record that he always creates division whenever he is in trouble. They also try to make the institutions fight with each other, so this is the old method of Nawaz Sharif, however, they will follow the same method, but one development that has taken place is within the parliament, the prime minister and the cabinet are made up of a three-member bench. Do not implement the decision. This resolution has been passed in the National Assembly. What is the legal status of this resolution. It will not matter.
These are big questions. There are some constitutional and legal points in it and they are constitutional experts. You will be able to tell me, but there are some straightforward and simple things. I will tell you now. First of all, you should see whether there is a resolution to reject the decision of the three-member bench of the Supreme Court in the election case and including the Prime Minister. The resolution to request the Cabinet not to implement this decision has been passed under the chairmanship of the Speaker of the National Assembly, Raja Pervez Ashraf.
The leader of Balochistan Awami Party, Khalid Magsi, presented the decision of the supreme court regarding the election case. Now, Khalid Magsi, you know that this is Balochistan Awami Party and from where the political parties of Balochistan, especially Balochistan Awami Party, are controlled. You know this very well, however, they have presented this resolution and the resolution was unanimously approved. Ah, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf opposed the resolution and one member of the assembly is present there, Mohsin Laghari Sahib, who has now won, and Mahmood Baki Maulvi, they have opposed the text of the resolution. What is the resolution? It was said that on March 28th, in this House, in the case number two thousand and twenty-three, supporting the majority decision of the four judges of the Supreme Court, it was implemented and the Supreme Judiciary was not involved in political and administrative matters.
It was demanded to avoid interference. Most of the constituencies also demanded the formation of full court, but it was not approved. The stand of other political parties, except one, was not heard. Ignoring the decision, the three-member special bench imposed a minority opinion, which is also a violation of the Supreme Court's own traditions and procedures. The minority has been imposed on the majority. According to the constitution and the law, the decision of the majority bench is enforced.
has also supported the decision of Qazi Faiz Isa Sahib who decided that the hearing of the cases which are under one eighty-four three under Somoto Notes should not be scheduled now in the Supreme Court of Pakistan, he supported it. This House views with deep concern the move to stop its implementation through another executive circular. Expresses strong reservations on appointing and taking a quick decision on it within a few minutes that such action is clearly against the traditions and precedents of the Supreme Court and therefore it is unacceptable. Expresses that the recent minority decision is creating political instability in the country and the way of division into federal units has been paved, so Awan is in accordance with the prevailing procedures in the constitution and law for political and economic stability in the country. The House considers the holding of general elections at the same time as the solution to all the problems. This House rejects the minority decision of the three-member bench and binds the Cabinet including the Prime Minister not to follow the decision of the Constitution and the law against it.
This House expresses serious concern over the misinterpretation of Article 63A of the Constitution and its renewal by the decision of the Supreme Court and demands that the full court of the Supreme Court will review it now that it has been done. Yes, a resolution has been presented that it is a decision of the supreme court of Pakistan, that decision should be implemented by the government of Pakistan, the federal cabinet and the prime minister should not act on it. You cannot insult the judiciary. You cannot criticize the judiciary. Honorable Mohsin Laghari said about this that I was not allowed to speak when the motion on the resolution was presented. By putting this wrong tradition, we are collectively causing contempt of the court, the cases under hearing in the judiciary cannot be discussed here.
Then Raja Sahib Mohsin Laghari said, "Do we want a war between the Parliament and the Judiciary? If the Judiciary is to be discussed, then write in the Constitution that judges can be discussed here. We are going on a dangerous path. Ninety days written in the Constitution. " The court is giving this decision because of asking to hold an election within the judiciary. As soon as the resolution against the judiciary was passed, the prime minister and the opposition leader left the house.
He was from the Supreme Court of Pakistan because Mr. Sharif had made such an arrangement in an Arab country, which by the way, they say that he was fired on top of Iqama for not receiving salary, but through them, companies are formed and money is made. Laundering is happening. Nawaz Sharif hid this whole game from the government of Pakistan or from Pakistan. Later, you saw that Nawaz Sharif was also jailed because of the charges against him. Not only was he disqualified, he was later jailed.
When Nawaz Sharif was disqualified, at that time PMLN had a good majority in the national assembly, but at that time PMLN did not bring any resolution. Look, if the resolution made that much difference, then the biggest loss of Noon League till date was when Nawaz Sharif was disqualified. So at that time they would come up with a resolution and reject the decision. And at that time, the decision will not be implemented, but at that time they did not do it because there is no scope in the law, a resolution can only be a resolution. Can you present a resolution against? Can you challenge the court by standing on the floor of the parliament?
If so, then you have presented the resolution, but can this resolution affect the court decision? I can't see. Otherwise, the people party faced many problems from the court. He would submit a resolution and dismiss the court decision. When Yusuf Raza Gilani was dismissed, Nawaz Sharif said that whether one prime minister goes or ten prime ministers go, the order of the Supreme Court of Pakistan will have to be obeyed. This is a human settlement, not an animal settlement.
This was said by Nawaz Sharif. So at that time they were talking about obeying the order, so at that time people party did not bring the resolution. That we come with a resolution and reject the decision and stop the Prime Minister and the Cabinet not to implement the decision. From the current decision of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, two things are very clear. First, they said that according to the constitution, the election should be held on time and there should be no unnecessary delay in the election. He said that the money that the federation needs should be given, the federation should give the money that it has to give to the election commission, and the third thing in it is that they issued orders to the Ministry of Defense and other institutions for the arrangements.
That they should cooperate with the provincial governments in their arrangements, when there is an election there, now I will tell you another data and this data is not being told by the government of Pakistan, nor is it coming from inside Pakistan, this data is coming. What is the report of the World Bank from the World Bank saying? The World Bank says that despite the severe financial crisis, the Pakistani government has been spending seven hundred billion rupees annually on financial support for the development projects of seventeen such ministries. After the 18th Amendment, the provinces have become the responsibility, that is, the 18th Amendment was passed during the reign of Asif Ali Zardari. The 18th Amendment was passed during the government of the People's Party. The provinces got a lot of autonomy.
There are many things in the Eighteenth Amendment that are wonderful, and anyway, the establishment of Pakistan did not like the Eighteenth Amendment at all because it reduced their power and gave more powers to the provincial governments. The federal government is still supporting the development projects of seventeen such ministries which have gone to the provinces and seven hundred and ten billion rupees are being spent annually. Successive governments, including the party, have revived all these ministries, resulting in a doubling of expenditure. The expenditure of these seventeen ministries has reached five nine percent of the GDP i. e. three hundred and twenty eight billion rupees annually.
On top of that, while they are not able to provide twenty one billion rupees for the election, from here you should understand that the issue is not about money, it is about the intention and the issue is that PDM has to go to the election. Fazlur Rahman's party played the same old game again, they said that Imran Khan is an agent of Jews, they will not allow him to come back to power under any circumstances. Mr. Fazlur Rehman's party has gone back to being the agent of the Jews, the agent of the Jews and the Christians, the enemy of the religion. I don't think that in the history of this subcontinent, Maulvi has used the religion of Islam so much for his politics. He calls all his political opponents as agents of Jews and Christians when necessary As soon as they sit in power with them, then they start to think that they are good people, that is, I remember very well that they told Benazir Bhutto in one era that the rule of a woman is not permissible and we accept it.
We will not do it, but then we saw that when diesel permit and other things were allegedly issues, then Fazlur Rehman was sitting on the ground and Benazir Bhutto was sitting on the sofa, so we saw these situations again. Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf has approached the Supreme Court for not getting the date of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa election and in this they have made a party to the governor of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa that the election should be held within ninety days. After that, the governor refused and later he went over the eight-proclamation, so the governor of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa is violating the court order. Tehreek-e-Insaf has filed an application. See also if the decision comes according to the constitution then the elections will have to be held on time. Many new accounts have been added in it and new recruits have been made in it.
Some of the old people who are there have also left and the news is also coming out because of them, but now it has been reviewed again. New blood has been infused into it and a new narrative will now be developed in the coming days and through this narrative an attempt will be made to prove that the PMLN is a martyr. They will try to become political martyrs, a new confrontation will be created with the judiciary and an attempt will be made to prove that they have been expelled again, but this time the situation is very serious. I had said some time ago that the ticket of PMLN is a valuable ticket in Punjab but this situation was when Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf was in government at that time which was the most popular ticket. He used to be of PMLN but now the situation has changed to a great extent now it is one sided. Many people will not take PMLN ticket you will see me in coming days over one marriage and not two marriages I attended few and few people I met then I got PMLN.
Friends said that he is not in the mode of fighting elections this time. So I asked him why, he said yes, for one thing, the situation is as high as the inflation that has been created for the people, how will we ask for votes from the people in one year? Second, the decisions of our leadership are constantly harming us. So there are not many people in election fighting mode at this time. It is to be seen whether they really go to fight the election. Are they really able to fight the election because a politician normally does not fight to lose an election and if they were in the mode of fighting an election, they would not run away from the election like this.
And in the people's party, they speak better and speak a little more openly and also talk about principles, often among them there is one Khawaja Saad Rafiq and one Qamar-ul-Zaman Kaira. That these are the people who go against their leadership position and sometimes do the right thing, but as much as I have seen both of them worried and nervous about the election, I have an idea that if these two people If they don't want to go to the election, then no one wants to go to the election and they will keep running away from the election, they will try again, blood will be killed again, planning will be done again on behalf of PDM and their handlers. Fahad Sahib reached out to Raza Rabbani Sahib who is doing anything to delay the election and Fahad Sahib tried to interview him, but he did not have any answer today. Raza Rabbani is the person who was shedding tears when the military courts were being built, who was crying that I am going to do such a thing. My vote is the trust of my party. But today he was not able to speak.
Fahad kept asking questions and repeatedly asking him that sir, you are talking about the constitution, you are talking about the law, at this time there is no need for you to speak. They were unable to do so. They were good politicians and very strong people, but their tongues were taken away from them. The PDM parties have done such actions together with the establishment. I will tell you in the future but some things are very clear that running away from the election is the biggest need of the moment and if there will be separate elections in each province then PD will be less likely to be rigged. There will be more difficulties for the MK parties and their facilitators, so they want the elections to be held simultaneously so that there are chances of rigging and a little delay in the election may give them a few more months or one.
They are even ready to go outside the constitution to get half a year more, but it is unfortunate and the people who relied on the establishment and on the behest of the facilitators on the behest of the powerful circles are becoming a lesson. He became a part of the dirty game of regime change and at this time he is afraid to go in public.
0 Comments