SC to Examine whether Bill to Clip CJP's Powers Violates the Constitution - Pakistan Times News

Peace be upon you, viewers, you are reading Pakistan Times News, I am Humayun Anwar, for one thing, the case has been heard in the supreme court of Pakistan, where the imported government has tried to reduce the powers of the supreme court of Pakistan, the news that came from the supreme court. It is that the hearing on the petitions against the Supreme Court Practice and Procedure Bill has been conducted by the eight-member bench of the Supreme Court under the chairmanship of the Chief Justice of Pakistan. Under which a large number of Rangers were also standing there.

There were also people in plain clothes. And the lawyers were trying to control it if there was any protest or anything like that. However, who is the petitioner, Raja Amir, his lawyer Imtiaz Siddiqui said in his arguments that this is the law or the legislation that is being made.

The independence of the judiciary has been interfered with. After the approval of both houses, the bill has been sent to the President again. The President raised objections and sent the bill back to the assembly and the political objections of the President were not reviewed this time and ten days after approval in the joint session, the bill will become law under Article One Hundred and Ninety One.

supreme court makes its own rules Article 199 which is if you want to change it then you have to amend the constitution and if you want to amend the constitution you need two-thirds majority for that simple majority Some people are saying here and some journalists have claimed that the people of PMLN want to adopt within OPTI. But Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf does not have enough capacity to accommodate many new people. But when I spoke to some people of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf earlier to know this, they said that we will accommodate some people and in the coming time, space will be created for some people.

Maybe that's the time, but let's get back to the case at hand. Imtiaz Siddiqui gave arguments in it. There are also some observations of the Chief Justice.

And justice remarked that according to you, the independence of the judiciary is a fundamental right which is fully protected by the constitution. According to you, the judiciary, like the parliament and the executive, also has constitutional protection. The supreme court has ordered the demolition of the marriage hall.

All the orders of the court were in accordance with the fundamental rights. Isn't the independence of the judiciary a fundamental right of the people? Through the proposed law, an attempt has been made to reduce the powers of the justice.

The most basic point of the sir is that the Supreme Court Powers Bill which is being brought by you has to be reviewed to see if there has been any violation of the Constitution. Amend without a two-thirds majority and even when you amend the constitution, it cannot conflict with the basic spirit of the constitution or the fundamental rights, that is, the interpretation of the constitution is the responsibility of the supreme court of Pakistan. Court of Pakistan says and all the media and political parties of Pakistan have said this in turn, so the supreme court of Pakistan has the power to decide the legislation that is being made or the constitution that is being made.

One-third is by the majority, does it conflict with the basic human rights, the spirit of Islam or the basic spirit of the constitution, then there is no such law, if it is made, then the supreme court can abolish it, so here the supreme court of Pakistan on this bench. which has the majority of judges of the supreme court has the power to change it and say that the legislation that has been passed is wrong, however, the bench has become over it and now the bench again. The Chief Justice of Pakistan will not need to make justice.

Muneeb Akhtar inquired what he wants from the court in the current case, on which the lawyer said that the supreme court practice and procedure bill should be declared unconstitutional. Arguments are also going on about this. The chief justice remarked that the independence of the judiciary is an important matter.

Parliament has great respect for the fact that it will be re-appointed soon. First of all, the supreme court of Pakistan can stop these things in violation of the constitution, the supreme court has this authority and will appoint judges for the hearing soon, taking into account the availability of judges. No, you will remember that the Chief Justice of Pakistan is Justice Ijazul Hasan Sahib, Justice Muneeb Akhtar Sahib, Justice Mazahir Naqvi Sahib, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar Sahib, Justice Ayesha Malik Sahib, Justice Hasan Azhar Rizvi Sahib, and Justice Shahid.

Mr. Waheed is included in this bench, while the judges who wrote the dissenting notes in recent days are not part of the larger bench because they wrote the dissenting notes, they themselves have made themselves a party in this case. Maybe the Chief Justice of Pakistan did not make them a part of this bench.

These are the fresh judges who are the remaining children who have separated themselves from an opinion about them. They should come through their independent opinion. However, this matter has come to the Supreme Court of Pakistan I think now this case will be taken again, whenever it is taken, this bench will hear it.

Now, the powers of the bench are being withdrawn from the Chief Justice of Pakistan. This bench of the Supreme Court of Pakistan will hear the case. This bench has now been formed.

Even if the powers are withdrawn, the same bench will hear the case. It will feel that this case will be taken up again, when this case is taken up again, then this law will not exist or it will be suspended, however, the government coalition once again rejected this bench of the Supreme Court of Pakistan It has been done, that is, whatever bench is formed by the Supreme Court, the government coalition rejects it, some people from the government coalition are sitting there, people do not even know the names of many of them. He said that we do not accept this bench and the legislative process we are doing should be allowed to be completed before its implementation.

We have done these kinds of things where they are and the honorable judges of the Supreme Court have expressed their objection to the one-man show biased and dictatorial behavior and the formation of specific benches in their decisions. The facts stated in the judgments of these honorable judges of the Supreme Court have become more clear. However, they objected to it and said yes, it cannot be.

And now they don't believe this bench. On the other hand, a strike call was also given. who is the lawyer leader of the PMLN side had given a call.

By the Supreme Court. The impact of the one call that was given was not seen in the courts of Pakistan. Allegedly, work has been going on in the courts according to routine.

And the strike on the alleged wish of the Muslim League was not completely successful. It has been successful. I have been telling you even yesterday that the lawyers of both sides have aligned.

Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf and its lawyers are on one side. There are a large number of people who want to stand with the constitution and the law and with the judiciary, now you will know their decision in a few days. Because the situation will come out after the round table conference and things will be revealed that what is actually happening in Pakistan now.

Another thing that was done. The Supreme Court of Pakistan is being continuously insulted. And this case is closed now.

Inside the court. The case is that the Supreme Court of Pakistan had said that the government should immediately provide 21 billion rupees to the Election Commission of Pakistan for the elections of Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Now this fund is independent from the parliament, this fund has to be given only by the government, and the government means the prime minister and the cabinet, but the prime minister and the cabinet did not give this fund, rather they sent the matter to the parliament and from there it was decided by the committees.

It went to the national assembly and cents committees, what happened there? Now you can see this. First of all, it was sent there unnecessarily.

The issue of whether to give funds or not. Now what happened there? The committees have rejected the election charge expenditure bill 2023 related to the funds of the general elections in Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

They don't want to fight and they are saying that we didn't give money for the election and it was a meeting of both of them separately. Well, the finance minister didn't join in it. Remember, the finance minister is wise, he sees things differently.

They are and try to keep themselves out of things, they have a stand, but they are not making legal arrests at any place. However, Ishaq Dar has been opposed by the members of the committee, both of which are separate, National Assembly and Cents. Both of them have opposed the provision of funds to the election commission and have demanded elections on the same day across the country.

They are not giving funds and what was said inside the court, what was said inside the court was that we are not giving funds because we don't have funds, we don't have money here in the national assembly and cents. It was not said, the actual reason was told here that we want elections to be held on the same day in the whole country, so we are not giving funds. See how much difference there is between the two things.

Funds four times more than that are going to various projects and they have been given continuous approvals, but the important point is that the Supreme Court of Pakistan said that the funds should be given, the Election Commission said that they were not given. It is being said that funds are not available and the position within the court was also maintained that there are no funds, while this position which the National Assembly. He is coming inside the senate, he is saying that no, we want to hold elections in one day, so we want to hold elections in one day.

There is no constitution written inside Pakistan. Elections to this assembly will be held within ninety days before completing their term. It is not written anywhere that the assembly will be dissolved.

Then its elections will not be held until the rest of the assemblies are dissolved and elections are not held for all at the same time. This is not written anywhere in the constitution. You should understand this clearly and every Pakistani should understand that whichever assembly is dissolved, according to the constitution of Pakistan, its elections will be held within ninety days.

If the national assembly is dissolved alone. So its elections alone will be held within ninety days. If the assembly of one province is dissolved alone, then its elections alone will be held within ninety days, and if more assemblies are dissolved together, then their elections will be held within ninety days.

If we will be together, this is the procedure to conduct the elections. What they are saying, what they are asking for is not according to the constitution of Pakistan. It is a political necessity, what they are asking is not according to the constitution of Pakistan.

It is a political necessity of PDM. It may be political of parties, people's party, but it is not a constitutional requirement, the constitutional requirement is election within ninety days, that's why the court did not emphasize the point that we want one in the whole country. With the election, it was said in the court that there is no fund and there is no security, and everything will be fixed by October 8, then we will get everything done.

However, whatever they are doing, everything is being caught. The people of Pakistan are watching and they are visible to the people of Pakistan. An in-camera meeting has also been called by the Speaker of the National Assembly and Raja Pervaiz Ashraf Sahib about it and some briefings will be given in it, especially.

And regarding other things, this session will start on Friday at 2. 30 pm. A new propaganda has been launched, Shahbaz Sharif has also contributed to it and some media houses have also been used, that Khan is now said to want better relations with America.

And for that they are pushing a lot. See, Pakistan should have better relations with America. Friendship should be with everyone.

Slavery should not belong to anyone. Imran Khan has been saying this since day one. A better and better relationship with America is in Pakistan's interest.

All the people of Pakistan know this. Pakistan can never progress by fighting. With peace and friendship, Pakistan can move forward, but if it does slavery, it will be completely left behind.

So Pakistan has not understood the difference between friendship and slavery till date, so Imran Khan wants to be friends with all the countries of the world, there is no problem. It should also be heard, but Imran Khan has spoken dozens of times that there was a fact and after his arrival, the operation was done very quickly and now he also says that General Bajwa had lobbied against him in America and that As a result of lobbying, that cipher-like incident took place and as a result of this cipher, an environment was created in Pakistan and then the government of Imran Khan was removed. Great terrible actions are being taken against Murad Saeed at that time Ali Amin Ganda.

Efforts are being made to keep Pur arrested under all circumstances, all this is being done to control those associates of Imran Khan before Eid, who are involved in obstructing the arrest of Imran Khan. It means that Imran Khan has some Jan Nisar associates who are present with him everywhere and not only remain present but also keep other people active. Some of them have been arrested, Imran Khan.

Sahib has a security in charge, he was arrested, Ali Amin Gandapur was arrested, the land is being narrowed for Murad Saeed, he is being worried that somehow he should be arrested, Junaid Saleem Sahib. It has been reported that they claim that there may be another attack on Imran Khan on the occasion of Eid and an attempt may be made to arrest Imran Khan. There was a break until Ramadan but in between.

During this interval, efforts are being made to reduce the power of Imran Khan and to alienate his workers from him, but one thing they do not understand is that they are ordinary people, citizens of Lahore. The whole world saw those who are ordinary Pakistanis, actually they came out, there were women, there were also children, there were also young people, there were elderly people, they obstructed the arrest of Imran Khan. They are coming after Khan.

This preparation was being done during Ramadan. On the other hand, Imran Khan is breaking his fast with his colleagues. I think that if the government tries to force something even after Eid, then there will be a situation.

will be created, but this will only benefit the government of Imran Khan. It has been agreed and now horses will be bought and sold in the coming days and efforts will be made to buy the people of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf to form the government of Pakistan people in Azad Kashmir, but whatever Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf can do at this time. The difficulties will increase for him because Tehreek-e-Insaf has become the most popular party in Azad Kashmir.

The Supreme Court of Pakistan is going to hear the most important case tomorrow in which the Election Commission of Pakistan. This is the case which has been rejected by the decision of the Supreme Court of Pakistan and the funds have been refused because three orders were given by the Supreme Court of Pakistan.

The first order was the Supreme Court of Pakistan to provide funds.The first order was the second order to the IG Punjab and the Chief Secretary to give a security plan. The third order was to the defense secretary to ensure the supply of forces. I will tell you some other things in the next video. Allah Hafiz will take care.